<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retail Advertising and Marketing: Have a Light Touch With the Devil</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.retaildoc.com/blog/devil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.retaildoc.com/blog/devil/</link>
	<description>The Retail Doctor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 21:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hamel</title>
		<link>http://www.retaildoc.com/blog/devil/#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hamel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.retaildoc.com/blog/?p=2833#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Interesting article about an interesting battle that applies to a lot of retail categories.  There are other examples of the little guy beating the big guy, and a question always exists about whether or how the big guy should respond.  California must have felt some impact from the Las Vegas pitch, otherwise it just gave Las Vegas some free awareness by including the Nevada campaign in its response.  Or maybe, as is the case with some companies, California legislators just felt compelled to respond because their egos got the better of them.  Great debate for business, Bob: respond or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article about an interesting battle that applies to a lot of retail categories.  There are other examples of the little guy beating the big guy, and a question always exists about whether or how the big guy should respond.  California must have felt some impact from the Las Vegas pitch, otherwise it just gave Las Vegas some free awareness by including the Nevada campaign in its response.  Or maybe, as is the case with some companies, California legislators just felt compelled to respond because their egos got the better of them.  Great debate for business, Bob: respond or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
